A question to NegLex officers and members
October 7th, 2008 by guru_fita2uhm…
firstly, i’ll ask this question to the president of NegLex… i hope this reaches her
why is it that you said during the ACALITMUS 2008 and even on the entry forms of the Acalitmus that the winner for each category will be the one to represent the school for the INTER SCHOOL ACALITMUS to be held on Nov. 21, but now, I have known that you will not follow that ruling?
i mean, it was WRITTEN PLAINLY ON PAPER AND IT WAS ANNOUNCED SEVERAL TIMES DURING THE COMPETITION, but now, you are trying to replace the winners?
I AM FROM THE INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND AS WE ALL KNOW, WE ARE THE GRAND SLAM WINNERS FOR THE MUSICAL CATEGORY. I FIND IT VERY OFFENSIVE ON OUR PART THAT YOU EVEN APPROACHED OUR ADVISER, I WON’T NAME HIM, TELLING HIM THAT THE WINNERS WILL BE REPLACED BY SOMEONE FROM THE IABF. TO QUOTE, YOU SAID TO HIM THAT THE “PERFORMANCES WERE BORING…”
MY QUESTION IS, WHY HOLD THE ACALITMUS COMPETITION IF IT WON’T EVEN SERVE ITS PURPOSE IN THE FIRST PLACE? YOU SHOULD HAVE JUST MADE THE COMPETITION “EXCLUSIVE” TO IABF STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS IF THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO IMPLY.
ALSO, YOUR ADVISER EVEN VISITED THE IE STUDENT COUNCIL OFFICE JUST TO REMIND US ABOUT THE MATTER THAT AS CHAMPIONS, WE ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN A “COMMITMENT LETTER” JUST TO ENSURE THAT WE WILL STILL PARTICIPATE IN THE INTER SCHOOL ACALITMUS. I FIND IT REALLY ABSURD. WE ALL KNOW ABOUT THE RESPONSIBLITY. IT WAS ALSO TO ME, BECAUSE I WAS THERE WHEN HE VISITED THE OFFICE, LIKE A SIGN OF TRYING TO DISSUADE US OF JOINING THE INTER SCHOOL ACALITMUS BECAUSE HE WAS LIKE TRYING TO INSINUATE TO US THAT OUR TEAMS HAD NO CHANCE OF WINNING IN THE INTER SCHOOL ESPECIALLY IN THE DANCE CATEGORY. THE ADVISER EVEN GAVE THE UE DANCE SQUAD AS AN EXAMPLE.
I HOPE THIS REALLY REACHES MISS BUELA?!? (IM NOT SURE…) WISH SHE COULD ANSWER THIS QUESTION(S) DIRECTLY AND ADDRESS IT ON THE ADVOCATE. WE DEMAND FOR AN EXPLANATION!










